(what's so funny bout) peace, love & understanding?
NY Times has another good(ish)* darfur article. Strange to say about something that even makes up regular episodes of ER but we do need constant reminding of the bonfire that is Sudan.
Someone sometime recently somewhere (ok it was that 'Empire' bloke Niall Ferguson wrote in the Daily Mail - I know I know, it was someone else's, I promise) wrote about how economic instability, the ending of empire & ethnic inequality where the fuel for genocide. I'd agree with that. He then went on to talk about the Middle East. Neocon numbskull. Sub-Saharan Africa has unfortunately got it all going on already. I suspect the middle east is going to be a whole NEW kind of fuck up.
* I say good, & I mean thought provoking. Article correctly points out that the rebels in Darfur are not saintly victims & actually are combatants in their own right. It rather neglects or misrepresents some of the reasons they fight - i.e. marginalisation and exploitation by central government, as well as local power. Yes, this is a politically driven war. Duh. Which ones aren't?
